<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Benjamin Camps · Notes</title>
    <link>https://benjamin-camps.com/en/notes/</link>
    <description>Occasional notes on product in regulated finance. Every regulatory statement is dated: this is material that expires.</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <atom:link href="https://benjamin-camps.com/en/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The Livret A rises to 1.7%. A chance to look at where a yield really comes from</title>
      <link>https://benjamin-camps.com/en/notes/livret-a-1-7-rendement-epargne-crypto-defi/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://benjamin-camps.com/en/notes/livret-a-1-7-rendement-epargne-crypto-defi/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>The Livret A rate rises to 1.7% on 1 August 2026. This state-guaranteed figure says something essential, by contrast, about the yields advertised by crypto and DeFi savings, and about what an honest product sheet should show.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A tokenized security is not a crypto-asset (under MiCA)</title>
      <link>https://benjamin-camps.com/en/notes/titre-tokenise-mica/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://benjamin-camps.com/en/notes/titre-tokenise-mica/</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>Do you need a MiCA licence to tokenize shares? No. The first question of any tokenization product is legal, not technical: is the asset a financial instrument? The answer decides the applicable text, the regulator, and everything downstream.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
